"Far says that the custody center has already reported public security official is department to rectify a false information in April

At river the north area court of the people, Chen always found out the statement of verdict in those early years clearly, originally drive river the north area court of the people sentence of"Chen always clear" by himself/herself not, but another and oneself together person in Wenzhou of the same surname, resided temporarily at that time at rather wave river north the area Ci city county east mountain village.Chen is always clearly native wave rather person, 2 people was together born in 1984, but the birthday is different.
Exactly is which link wrong?Rather custody center pair bureau chief in wave City far accepts a reporter to cover acknowledgement, is inside of the staff member appeared a mistake when 2002 carries on an information to repair to record, resided temporarily a county at the Ci city at that time east the information mistake of "Chen in Wenzhou always clear" of the mountain village ascends"rather wave Chen always clear" that lived public village in the house.
"The circumstance like this once appeared as well before."Far says that the custody center has already reported public security official is department to rectify a false information in April, 2010.Currently, rather the north area Ci city police substation of river in wave City, rather the north area court of the people etc. unit of river in wave City all always gives an itemized lists of the proof of having no criminal record clearly for Chen Louboutin Sale and took these proof, Chen always clear regrets:"Returning me on the whole is innocent!"
Expert is standpoint
"Drive record of previous crime" can Louboutin Sale apply for indemnification